I know many of you read Wingate's book when it first appeared in 2017 or have seen the made-for-TV movies based on Tann's actions, but the topic was relevant to me and also seemed timely to current events.
Georgia Tann, proprietor of Memphis Children's Home Society |
During the Great Depression, an estimated 50,000 people lived
nomadic lives on the waterways of the country.
The shanty boat families often camped along the riverbanks when they weren't moving back and forth on the water. These poor
families were one group that Tann and her henchmen preyed upon.
Wingate’s fictional narrative tells the story of one shanty boat family. Rill Foss and her siblings are taken from their river gypsy parents, Briny and Queenie Foss, through trickery and strong arm tactics. When Queenie, the mother, has trouble delivering twins with the aid of a midwife on their houseboat, Briny rushes Queenie to the hospital in Memphis. The doctor tells Briny and Queenie that the twins died, a common ploy that the Memphis Children’s Home Society uses to obtain newborns for adoption. Hospital personnel then trick Briny and Queenie into signing papers that terminate their parental rights for all their children.
Wingate’s fictional narrative tells the story of one shanty boat family. Rill Foss and her siblings are taken from their river gypsy parents, Briny and Queenie Foss, through trickery and strong arm tactics. When Queenie, the mother, has trouble delivering twins with the aid of a midwife on their houseboat, Briny rushes Queenie to the hospital in Memphis. The doctor tells Briny and Queenie that the twins died, a common ploy that the Memphis Children’s Home Society uses to obtain newborns for adoption. Hospital personnel then trick Briny and Queenie into signing papers that terminate their parental rights for all their children.
While
the Foss children are home alone on the houseboat awaiting the return of their
parents, men board the boat, abduct the children and take them to a
boarding house for children in Memphis, which is part of the Tennessee Children’s
Home Society. The oldest child Rill tries desperately to watch after her four
siblings, Camellia, Fern, Lark and Gabion in the harsh conditions of the
boarding house filled with other children. Rill soon discovers that children
disappear from this facility; some children are adopted after adoptive parents
pay the proprietor of the enterprise, Georgia Tann, a substantial fee, while
others just disappear and are presumed dead.
Friends of Briny and Queenie from the river shantytown, Zede and Silas, try to help the children escape, but by then the family has been destroyed. Rill and her sister Fern are fortunate to be placed together, adopted by a wealthy family who loves them, treats them kindly, and provides them with many advantages growing up. Rill resigns herself to being May Weathers, the name given to her by her new family.
Friends of Briny and Queenie from the river shantytown, Zede and Silas, try to help the children escape, but by then the family has been destroyed. Rill and her sister Fern are fortunate to be placed together, adopted by a wealthy family who loves them, treats them kindly, and provides them with many advantages growing up. Rill resigns herself to being May Weathers, the name given to her by her new family.
The
story of the Foss children unfolds in alternating chapters in Wingate’s book. Rill’s
voice details the horrifying circumstances she and her siblings face as they
are forcibly removed from their riverboat home and taken to the Memphis
Children’s Home Society. The next
chapter switches to present day and is the voice of Avery Stafford, a young
woman from a prominent political family in Memphis. Avery is searching for
answers about her beloved grandmother Judith’s life as Judith Stafford’s
memories and words are lost to dementia. Eventually the lives of the women,
Avery Stafford, May Weathers, and Judith Stafford, intersect.
Georgia
Tann’s contemporaries were either ignorant of her nefarious network or willing
to ignore her methods of procurement and treatment of children. At one time, Tann’s
contemporaries praised her as the “mother of modern adoption.” Because Tann
catered to prominent men and women who desperately wanted children, the stigma
of adoption began to disappear. Actors
Joan Crawford, Lana Turner, June Allyson and Dick Powell used her agency to
adopt children. Eleanor Roosevelt sought Tann’s advice on issues of adoption
and child welfare during the Depression.
In
1945 between 40 and 50 infants in Tann’s boarding homes died of dysentery. However, Tann and her network were so embedded
into the circles of power and control that when the Tennessee legislature passed
a law requiring that all boarding houses for children must be licensed, they
exempted her establishments.
Actresses Joan Crawford and June Allyson with the children they adopted from the Memphis Children's Home Society |
When a Tennessee governor who wasn’t a friend of Tann was elected, her
lucrative empire began to crumble. A
1950 study of the Tennessee Children’s Home Society exposed the horrors of the Memphis
operations, and the report was submitted to the Tennessee governor.
Many parents whose children were stolen from
them tried for years to find their children.
Authorities made this next to impossible. Even after the horrors committed
by Georgia Tann were exposed, Tennessee public officials sealed the records of
her homes until 1995!
During
the years Tann operated her series of boarding houses for “orphans,” it’s estimated that 500 children died in
these institutions. In recent years, Tann
has been described as the most prolific serial killer of children in US
history.
Wingate
consulted multiple sources to confirm and tell the story of the Memphis
Children’s Home Society: books, articles, plus the 1950 report to the governor of Tennessee.
Once
again, an ugly chapter involving the treatment of poor children is being written in the United States. Along our southern border from April--June 2018, Border
Patrols agents and immigration officials separated an estimated 3,000
children from their parents, immigrants from Central America, who are trying to enter the US from Mexico.
According
to parents, government immigration agents told the parents that their children were
being taken to another space for a shower or bathroom break but in reality, the
children were removed to large holding facilities until the Office of Refugee
Resettlement (ORR) could take custody of the children. The adults were sent to
detention centers without seeing their children. Some immigrants report that they were pressured to sign forms
waiving their reunification rights, others were told if they agreed to
deportation, they would be reunited with their children more quickly. This was
a lie.
When the president of the American Academy of Pediatrics,
Colleen Kraft, toured a Texas holding facility for children, she found children
in great distress. Kraft wrote after her visit, “Separating children from their
parents contradicts everything we stand for as pediatricians – protecting and
promoting children’s health. In fact, highly stressful experiences, like family
separation, can cause irreparable harm, disrupting a child’s brain architecture
and affecting his or her short and long-term health.” Long-term toxic stress bathes the brain in hormones that can permanently alter the "wiring" of a child's brain.
On July 20 President Trump finally ended the wholesale separation of
children from their parents, bowing to intense political and public pressure,
and US District Judge Dana Sabraw gave the government until July 26 to reunite
children with their parents. The government says it reunited 1,820 children
with their parents or close family relatives by the deadline.
As of July 29, 711 children had not yet been reunited with
their families. The parents of 431 children have already been deported, making
the reunification process more difficult. Immigrant advocacy lawyers continue
to work on behalf of these children and their families, trying to reunite
children with parents or other family members.
I think of the Memphis Society Children’s Society Home when I
read of the horrors these immigrant parents have endured.
Wingate dedicates Before We Were Yours, to “… the hundreds [of children] who vanished and for the thousands who didn’t. May your stories not be forgotten.”
I hope the stories of these immigrant families are not forgotten, because the United States is a better country than these incidents indicate.
Wingate dedicates Before We Were Yours, to “… the hundreds [of children] who vanished and for the thousands who didn’t. May your stories not be forgotten.”
I hope the stories of these immigrant families are not forgotten, because the United States is a better country than these incidents indicate.
Fascinating and horrific subject. That this woman had so many government officials in her pocket and got away with it for so long is amazing and sickening. I don’t think I could read the book. It would be too upsetting. I have read about Tann before. The link to your story about the case you worked on didn’t work.
ReplyDeleteWingate has written a powerful book, but the reader is left with hope. Thanks for telling me about the link, I'm having trouble with them this week for some reason. I really appreciate your taking time to read this post and comment on it.
DeleteOh. What we do to children. Sometimes there seems so little hope for improvement. Almost every effort to provide for abandoned children (whatever the reasons) has led to abuse. Remember the Orphan Trains that took the unwanted children from New York's streets and sent them West? Some children were lucky, but most were just free labor. And now--taking children from parents and then giving them psychotropic drugs...
ReplyDeleteI've heard that Mr. and Mrs. Marak who were in the real estate business in Shreveport (the older Maraks, their children still have a business here) were both on an Orphan Train. I can't imagine. As I learn more about brain development, It's a wonder that so many children are relatively unimpaired when you consider their early circumstances.
DeletePaul Tough talks about the importance of at least one caring parent/guardian:
Delete"Tough's research focuses on children who are disadvantaged by poverty, violence, and/or abuse. Why and how do some of these kids overcome these circumstances? The most important element (again, common sense) is that the kids who succeed have at least one person truly invested in their care. Despite poverty and violence, if a child has one person who values and nurtures him, the chance of success in school and in life increases exponentially." -from How Children Succeed
Didn't you read this one, too?
Oops, that quote is actually from my review of the book.
DeleteYes, I read most of that book. I got bogged down, not because of him but because of me. I started reading something else. There is so much research on resilience that says something similar. That's one reason I stayed around to supervise the implementation of the Early Head Start program after I wrote the grant. Because the EHS teachers have the same children in their class possibly for 3+ years (from 2 mos til 3 1/2 years of age), EHS can impact brain development for those who have unstable home lives. Of course poverty does not mean your development is neglected, it just greatly increases the chances. One teacher who left EHS and went into the early intervention system as a caseworker still has one of her students (now a teenager) to visit in her home. She really has served as another mother to her and teaches her skills (just the care of her clothing, for example) that she doesn't get at home.
Delete